Assignment 1 Rework: A Pretty Landskip of His Own Possessions

I have reworked assignment 1 following my tutor’s comments that the pictures needed to be presented more effectively to allow a better understanding of my intentions.

The rework returns to Joseph Addison’s 1712 essay (3) that described the new thinking that led to the English landscape garden movement in the eighteenth century. As noted elsewhere this essay includes the first known use of the word landskip or landscape to describe land as opposed to a painting of land (ii) so Addison not only documents what would become the agenda for English gardening for the next fifty years he presaged the term landscape garden and established the distinction between land and landscape.

I have selected parts of that essay as captions but have placed the captions on the image rather than using the caption function in WordPress. This stops WordPress adding a frame and links the text more closely with the photograph, it also means the viewer will generally need to open the image to read the text. I have resequenced the images with the intent of there being a flow of both picture and text.

The original supporting text is included below the last picture.

Background

In 1724 Henry Hoare II, known to the Hoare family as Henry the “Magnificent”, inherited Stourhead which had been acquired by his father in 1717 for the princely sum of £14,000 (1: p.5). As well as acquiring the rather run-down Wiltshire estate at the tender age of nineteen he became the owner of Hoare’s Bank and for the next twenty odd years his focus was primarily in the city of London but between 1738 and 1741 he took a belated gap year, or three, and embarked on the Grand Tour spending much of his time in Italy. We can assume that like many of his generation he returned inspired by the Italian landscape, classical architecture and the paintings of the Romantic artists (i).

When Hoare moved to Stourhead after the death of his wife in 1743 he began to plan, build and plant a garden quite unlike anything that had previously been seen on this scale, a garden design that subscribed to a new concept of gardening which, as discussed (here), had been quietly evolving in England and Holland since the late seventeenth century. The idea was best described by Joseph Addison in an article for the Spectator in 1712:

“But why may not a whole estate be thrown into a kind of garden by frequent plantations, that may turn as much to the profit as the pleasure of the owner? A marsh overgrown with willows, or a mountain shaded with oaks, are not only more beautiful, but more beneficial, than when they lie bare and unadorned. fields of corn make a pleasant prospect, and if the walks were a little taken care of that lie between them, if the natural embroidery of the meadows were helped and improved by some small additions of art, and the several rows of hedges set off by trees and flowers that the soil was capable of receiving, a man might make a pretty landskip of his own possessions.” (3)

This is the first known use of the word landskip or landscape to describe land as opposed to a painting of land (ii) so in his essay Addison not only documents what would become the agenda for English gardening for the next fifty years he presaged the term landscape garden and established the distinction between land and landscape.

Tim Robinson puts into perspective what happened next:

“The English Landscape is the greatest artform ever to have been devised in the British Isles. What is more, it is an artform that has gone on to influence the rest of the world like no other in our history.” (2: loc. 254)

Choice of Shoot Location

I have spent much of the last two months gaining an understanding of landscape photography’s roots in landscape painting; I also followed a thread from that same source that took me into the development of the English landscape garden. So, when asked to produce a series that conveys my “interpretation of beauty and/or the sublime within the context of landscape” it seemed a natural progression to choose Stourhead as the site for this project. A place that neatly brings those threads back together.

Series Concept

As previously discussed (here)  the visible surface of the British landscape is man-made, there is no primordial forest or untamed wilderness here, we have exploited and moulded the land to create our habitat, agriculture, industry and transport arteries. But, however hard we try to suppress or tame nature it pushes back; seeds, grows, spreads, withers, dies, rots and feeds itself again, an ever repeating cycle that invades any space we ignore. Nature is chaotic, it has no aesthetic gene, it creeps, clings, thrusts, tangles, burrows and shoots in any direction it can as plants compete for light and nutrients; it strives to reclaim the land, to reinstate the dark and endless forests that once clothed Britain.

Our distant ancestors began to push back the forest edge; until the Roman occupation of Britain and the development of towns people lived in cleared spaces of varying sizes that would have had the forest’s fringe in view. The edge land where forest and open spaces met would have been a familiar place, where order became chaos, light became dark, known became unknown; the place where myths began.

I am intrigued by the great pioneering landscape gardeners, the ones before Capability Brown, the landowners who saw themselves as painters of the land, who created art by organising nature on a monumental scale. Their concept has passed the test of time but the gardens at Stourhead, Stowe or Castle Howard are not what Hoare and his contemporaries designed. They have moved on, new planting has been undertaken, new buildings constructed and some saplings have become mighty whilst many have long since died.

But it struck me that around the edges, where landscaped garden meets natural forest, perhaps little has changed; nature creeps back, crossing the margins of the manicured land, natural water courses reaffirm their rights to ancient routes across the designed spaces, significant components of the original design become diseased and die and dying is an untidy business.

I approached Stourhead, “the quintessential landscape garden” (2: loc.6423), to explore this margin between that most tamed land, the garden, the beautiful, picturesque country garden coiffured by a thousand gardeners for three centuries, and the sublime natural energy that waits in the shadowy margins for an opening to exploit, an opportunity to subvert their designs.

Notes on Text

(i) From the late sixteenth century young aristocrats from Britain, Germany and Scandinavia visited the great European capitals of London, Paris, Venice, Florence and Rome as the culmination of their classical studies. These young men had enjoyed a classical education studying Greek and Latin literature and it was considered an essential attribute of men of this class to have an appropriate interest in the arts. The Grand Tour, as it came to be known had a significant commercial influence on the arts with painters such as Claude Lorrain, Canalleto and many others basing their practices on the creation of ‘souvenirs’ for  wealthy tourists. Claude Lorrain was so popular with British tourists that at “one point fully two thirds of his paintings were in Britain and the British museum still holds 40% of his drawings” (2). Tim Robinson argues that at the beginning of the eighteenth century there were only a “few dozen” Britons who could be termed connoisseurs of painted art and that the Grand Tourists made their purchasing decisions based on the advice of art dealers rather then their own taste. (2: loc.6446) 

(ii) Landskip was term derived from the Dutch  word landschap or land shape in English. Robinson states that, prior to Addison’s essay, it had been used “exclusively to describe landscape paintings” (2: p.2084).

Sources

Books

(1) Woodbridge, Kenneth ( 1986) The Stourhead Landscape. London: The National Trust

(2) Richardson, Tim (2008) Arcadian Friends (kindle edition) London: Transworld

Internet

(3) Addison, Joseph (1712) The Pleasures of Imagination (accessed at Mnstate 14.2.17) – http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/addison414.htm

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Leave a comment

Assignment 1: Tutor Feedback

Overall Comments

You present a thorough and exhaustive exploration for this first assignment. The body of work is well referenced and analysed within its historical, social and political context. There is a a good mix of cultural analysis interspersed with personal experience/opinion, that makes for interesting reading. If may be so bold I feel there are some areas that are overlooked in your analysis, which I will outline below, however there is the word count to consider and it’s a weighty tome already! Excellent work Steve.

Feedback on assignment

A well thought out and considered set of images that explore the margins of the manicured edge lands at Stourhead. The concept works well and you investigate the areas to good effect using different framing devices to draw the viewer into a variety of scenes.

Depending on your particular interest (history/geology/botony) I think there’s much here to enjoy. It’s hard however to assess the success of the images on the screen. Presented as they are currently I only really understand your intentions after reading the accompanying text. To really push the practical work up to the level of the written work my feeling is that the final images need greater thought in their presentation.

What are your thoughts on presenting the work for assessment?

My feeling is that it would improve the quality of outcome were you to give more thought to the titling and sequencing of the images. For example something to physically locate the image to a marginal location? A grid reference?(ref. M Power/A-Z), a map? (ref. Hidden Islam), fold out pages?

Based on this feedback I will look at three possibilities:

  1. Referencing a map as per Mark Power Twenty Six Different Endings / The Shipping Forecast. Power explains that “I can only make sense of a place if I see it pictured in two-dimensions” (1) I share this interest in maps, being also unable to venture into an unknown space without first studying the topography in two dimensions.
  2. Incorporating a map or maps into the presentation of the work as per Nicoló Degiorgis’ Hidden Islam. 
  3. Using Joseph Addison’s 1712 essay  The Pleasures of Imagination as a source for text to use as captions. (2)
  4. Or some combination of the above

Some of the images work better than others in depicting the contrast between the ‘landscaped’ and the wild/overgrown. I can see that you are trying to balance the set and not repeat the motif too much here, I enjoy the nuances within the work but I think the contrast could be made more explicit in some of the images.

I take the point but I wasn’t necessarily looking for direct or obvious contrast between the ‘landscaped’ and the ‘wild/overgrown’. For example the ponds that appear in many of the images are man-made; it is not clear whether they were created by Henry Hoare as part of his landscaping or whether they have been formed for agricultural or industrial purposes at an earlier time and the dead or dying tree might be part of Hoare’s original planting. I wanted to maintain a certain level of ambiguity and subtlety in the series rather than just comparing the obvious ‘garden’ to the obvious ‘wilderness’.

It would be nice to see the accompanying contact sheets for the next assignment.

I will include contact sheets going forward and have added one to my blog for this assignment as a point of reference (here).

I like the way you have used the language of ‘A pretty Landskip of his own possessions’ I wonder if something of this word play could be brought into the title of each image, adding a further level to the reading of this image. You have done so much in the way of research I think the presentation of the final images would do well to reflect this and inform the reader in a more immediate way of some of the background reading you have undertaken.

A good idea as mentioned above.

Coursework

You make some excellent points within the projects/exercises accompanying this assignment, especially in relation to the fluidity of context in which we view the work of photographers. Thoroughly researched and well referenced throughout, you fulfil the brief and go beyond it in most cases. I’d say watch the word count, but as there isn’t one for the exercises/projects and it is all so fascinating it can be hard to trim it down. For the most part you keep to the main point with very little wondering. These exercises are really for your benefit/wider research and it’s good to see you engaging so thoroughly with them.

I am pleased that my tutor hasn’t come down too hard on me for including such long essays. The subjects I have looked at are so broad in scope that it was highly challenging to find a succinct path through them.

Some Points to Consider:

I’m not sure of the comparison with the Camel Estuary/Simon Roberts as an example of the Pastoral which I have always associated with the rural landscape – what were your thoughts here?

The Oxford dictionary defines pastoral as “(of a work of art) portraying or evoking country life, typically in a romanticized or idealized form.” and I see this idea as being at the heart of We English

He looks at the English countryside as an amenity, a place to visit and pursue “healthy activities”, to camp, walk, picnic, sight-see, sledge, fish, play sport or holiday; he selects quintessential English landscapes as the site of these activities and in doing so creates idyllic scenes that are as much romanticised as any photograph of a shepherd and his flock. If we remove the day-trippers from his photographs we see an industrial or agricultural landscape that has been exploited and modified by humans as an economic resource (maybe the beaches are an exception). The countryside wears these two hats – an idyllic amenity overlaying an economic resource with the former representing, if not wealth, at least disposable income, and the latter potentially representing the struggle of rural industries and communities.

I make no claim to originality here. Simon Robert’s website describes We English”:

“The resulting images are an intentionally lyrical rendering of a pastoral England, where Roberts finds beauty in the mundane and in the exploration of the relationship between people and place, and of our connections to the landscapes around us.” (3)

However, You didn’t draw a picture but used an existing image. I note your discussion with a peer at the bottom of the post where you state your reason for doing so but I’m wondering why the reluctance, the idea is to free yourself up from the technicalities of holding a camera – let go!

Research & Learning Log

    • Comprehensive presentation of research throughout the learning log.
    • An exhaustive, but relevant, amount of written work which is fully referenced.
    • Use of hyperlinks to link back to previous work, used to good effect, adding depth to written text and demonstrating prior learning/engagement.
    • Thorough analysis of course materials and other relevant sources, drawing well rounded conclusions, interspersed with personal experience/point of view.
    • Uses a wide range of reading/external sources to make links between the contemporary and the historic.
    • Engages in peer to peer feedback/dialogue, good to see debate and reflection within projects and exercises.

Areas for Development:

A different perspective – this is probably outside of this assignment brief and will be covered later in the course, but I can’t resist! You have covered so much already within this assignment but I feel there is something missing from the discussion at this level – women and their experience of the landscape. Landscape can be so (historically) dominated by a white male view that we can become blind to the experience of others who have had their view restricted within art history. It’s all too easy to carry a version of history and the language of that history forward if we don’t apply a different lens to our contemporary critique. The use of the title – A Pretty Landskip of His Own Possessions, is a case in point about ownership, power and control which the landscape comes to symbolise.

I know I have suggested good old Liz Wells before, but I really can’t stress enough how much I think she succinctly locates the British landscape within it’s cultural context. Have you read the chapter on the female gaze/experience of the landscape? I think this is an area for you to consider and broaden out from, an intersectional feminist critique of the British landscape. Who is missing from the view? Who is included/excluded from the landscape. This can be broadened out to include many other views/lenses including the colonial, racial, national identity, and all the points where any of these views/experiences inter-sect.

Following an email conversation with my tutor I will digress a little at this point and consider the role of race and gender in landscape art.

A smaller point – the exercises/project in the learning log could be labelled numerically so easier for assessor to locate, i.e. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 etc

I will fix.

Suggested reading/viewing

Hall S, 2000, “Whose heritage? : unsettling `the heritage’, re-imagining the post- nation” Third Text 49 (Winter) 3 – 13

Kinsman P, 1995, “Landscape, race and national identity: the photography of Ingrid Pollard” Area 27 300 – 310

Liz Wells, Land Matters.

Nash C, 1996, “Reclaiming vision: looking at landscape and the body” Gender, Place and Culture 3 149 – 169

Sources

Books

Internet

(1) Power, Mark (2014) Mark Power: Twenty Six Different Endings (accessed at Bleek magazine  26.8.16) – http://bleek-magazine.com/stories/mark-power/

(2) Addison, Joseph (1712) The Pleasures of Imagination (accessed at Mnstate 14.2.17) – http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/addison414.htm

(3) Roberts, Simon (2009) We English (accessed at the photographer’s website 12.3.17) – http://www.simoncroberts.com/work/we-english/#PHOTO_56

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Assignment 1: Contact Sheets

There were three distinct sets of edited images that I considered developing for assignment 1.

The first set were picturesque representations of the Stourhead landscape but cropped as panoramas to disrupt the idea of using a conventional 4:3 or 10:8 aspect ratio. Jesse Alexander explains that the horizontal ‘landscape’ frame is “closer to naturalistic ocular vision than is a square or a vertical frame” (1: p.31) (i)

Wide aspect landscape photographs whilst not common are often used to good effect. Josef Koudelka’s Wall (2) comes to mind where the seemingly omnipresent Israeli “security fence” is made more oppressive and full of foreboding by his panoramic viewpoint. David Anthony Hall (3) whose main subject matter is trees, uses panoramas to provide a sense of scale and the patterns of the forest.

In the early part of the shoot when the light was supportive of the idea of capturing picturesque views I took a number of shots that I thought would lend themselves to a 2.35:1 aspect ratio.

Stourhead Contact Sheet #5 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

If picturesque had been my intent for the project these type of views might have been a starting point for an exploration of the landscaped spaces of Stourhead but they tell us nothing new or interesting about the site.

As the shoot developed I became more interested in the margins between the landscaped garden and the more natural woodland that surrounds it and began to focus on places where nature was attempting to restore the natural order of things.

In post production I cropped a number of these pictures as squares, again thinking about ways to subvert the conventional landscape aesthetic. The square aspect tightly frames the landscape and works especially well for studies of woodland. Fay Godwin regularly but not exclusively worked in this format (4 & 5) as did Bill Brandt (6) and it is most commonly associated with medium format 6×6 cameras.

Stourhead Contact Sheet #4 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

I think I could have developed a series based on these square crops but I had not been photographing with that idea in mind and too many of the edited shots felt contrived.

Giving up all hope of subversion I settled for a very traditional 4:3 aspect ratio for my short list.

Stourhead Contact Sheet #1 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead Contact Sheet #2 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead Contact Sheet #3 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Notes on Text

(i) Many panoramic or wide screen aspect ratios are borrowed from cinema; the traditional Academy ratio of 1:375:1, Cinemascope at 2.35:1 or the accepted TV format of 16:9. As the most panoramic crop I have used 2.35:1 on several occasions.

Sources

Books

(1) Alexander, J.A.P. (2015) Perspectives on Place. London: Bloomsbury

(2) Koudelka, Josef. (2014) Wall: Israeli and Palestinian Lanscape 2008 – 2012. New York: Aperture.

(4) Godwin, Fay (2001) Landmarks. Stockport: Dewi Lewis Publishing

(5) Godwin, Fay (1985) Land. Boston: Little, Brown and Company

(6) Hermann Meister, Sarah (2013) Bill Brandt: Shadow and Light. London: Thames and Hudson

Internet

(3) Hall, David Anthony (ND) In Progress (accessed at the photographer’s website 13.3.17) – http://www.davidanthonyhall.com/inprogressfull

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Assignment 1: A Pretty Landskip of His Own Possessions

The Lake and The River God's Cave at Stourhead - Steve Middlehurst 2017

The Lake and The River God’s Cave at Stourhead – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Background

In 1724 Henry Hoare II, known to the Hoare family as Henry the “Magnificent”, inherited Stourhead which had been acquired by his father in 1717 for the princely sum of £14,000 (1: p.5). As well as acquiring the rather run-down Wiltshire estate at the tender age of nineteen he became the owner of Hoare’s Bank and for the next twenty odd years his focus was primarily in the city of London but between 1738 and 1741 he took a belated gap year, or three, and embarked on the Grand Tour spending much of his time in Italy. We can assume that like many of his generation he returned inspired by the Italian landscape, classical architecture and the paintings of the Romantic artists (i).

When Hoare moved to Stourhead after the death of his wife in 1743 he began to plan, build and plant a garden quite unlike anything that had previously been seen on this scale, a garden design that subscribed to a new concept of gardening which, as discussed (here), had been quietly evolving in England and Holland since the late seventeenth century. The idea was best described by Joseph Addison in an article for the Spectator in 1712:

“But why may not a whole estate be thrown into a kind of garden by frequent plantations, that may turn as much to the profit as the pleasure of the owner? A marsh overgrown with willows, or a mountain shaded with oaks, are not only more beautiful, but more beneficial, than when they lie bare and unadorned. fields of corn make a pleasant prospect, and if the walks were a little taken care of that lie between them, if the natural embroidery of the meadows were helped and improved by some small additions of art, and the several rows of hedges set off by trees and flowers that the soil was capable of receiving, a man might make a pretty landskip of his own possessions.” (3)

This is the first known use of the word landskip or landscape to describe land as opposed to a painting of land (ii) so in his essay Addison not only documents what would become the agenda for English gardening for the next fifty years he presaged the term landscape garden and established the distinction between land and landscape.

Tim Robinson puts into perspective what happened next:

“The English Landscape is the greatest artform ever to have been devised in the British Isles. What is more, it is an artform that has gone on to influence the rest of the world like no other in our history.” (2: loc. 254)

Choice of Shoot Location

I have spent much of the last two months gaining an understanding of landscape photography’s roots in landscape painting; I also followed a thread from that same source that took me into the development of the English landscape garden. So, when asked to produce a series that conveys my “interpretation of beauty and/or the sublime within the context of landscape” it seemed a natural progression to choose Stourhead as the site for this project. A place that neatly brings those threads back together.

Series Concept

As previously discussed (here)  the visible surface of the British landscape is man-made, there is no primordial forest or untamed wilderness here, we have exploited and moulded the land to create our habitat, agriculture, industry and transport arteries. But, however hard we try to suppress or tame nature it pushes back; seeds, grows, spreads, withers, dies, rots and feeds itself again, an ever repeating cycle that invades any space we ignore. Nature is chaotic, it has no aesthetic gene, it creeps, clings, thrusts, tangles, burrows and shoots in any direction it can as plants compete for light and nutrients; it strives to reclaim the land, to reinstate the dark and endless forests that once clothed Britain.

Our distant ancestors began to push back the forest edge; until the Roman occupation of Britain and the development of towns people lived in cleared spaces of varying sizes that would have had the forest’s fringe in view. The edge land where forest and open spaces met would have been a familiar place, where order became chaos, light became dark, known became unknown; the place where myths began.

I am intrigued by the great pioneering landscape gardeners, the ones before Capability Brown, the landowners who saw themselves as painters of the land, who created art by organising nature on a monumental scale. Their concept has passed the test of time but the gardens at Stourhead, Stowe or Castle Howard are not what Hoare and his contemporaries designed. They have moved on, new planting has been undertaken, new buildings constructed and some saplings have become mighty whilst many have long since died.

But it struck me that around the edges, where landscaped garden meets natural forest, perhaps little has changed; nature creeps back, crossing the margins of the manicured land, natural water courses reaffirm their rights to ancient routes across the designed spaces, significant components of the original design become diseased and die and dying is an untidy business.

I approached Stourhead, “the quintessential landscape garden” (2: loc.6423), to explore this margin between that most tamed land, the garden, the beautiful, picturesque country garden coiffured by a thousand gardeners for three centuries, and the sublime natural energy that waits in the shadowy margins for an opening to exploit, an opportunity to subvert their designs.

The Series – A Pretty Landskip of His Own Possessions

Stourhead 01 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 1 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 02 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 2 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 03 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 3 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 04 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 4 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 05 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 5 – A Pretty Landskip- Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 06 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 6 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 07 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 7 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 08 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Fig. 8 – A Pretty Landskip – Steve Middlehurst 2017

——– * ——–

Notes on Text

(i) From the late sixteenth century young aristocrats from Britain, Germany and Scandinavia visited the great European capitals of London, Paris, Venice, Florence and Rome as the culmination of their classical studies. These young men had enjoyed a classical education studying Greek and Latin literature and it was considered an essential attribute of men of this class to have an appropriate interest in the arts. The Grand Tour, as it came to be known had a significant commercial influence on the arts with painters such as Claude Lorrain, Canalleto and many others basing their practices on the creation of ‘souvenirs’ for  wealthy tourists. Claude Lorrain was so popular with British tourists that at “one point fully two thirds of his paintings were in Britain and the British museum still holds 40% of his drawings” (2). Tim Robinson argues that at the beginning of the eighteenth century there were only a “few dozen” Britons who could be termed connoisseurs of painted art and that the Grand Tourists made their purchasing decisions based on the advice of art dealers rather then their own taste. (2: loc.6446) 

(ii) Landskip was term derived from the Dutch  word landschap or land shape in English. Robinson states that, prior to Addison’s essay, it had been used “exclusively to describe landscape paintings” (2: p.2084).

Sources

Books

(1) Woodbridge, Kenneth ( 1986) The Stourhead Landscape. London: The National Trust

(2) Richardson, Tim (2008) Arcadian Friends (kindle edition) London: Transworld

Internet

(3) Addison, Joseph (1712) The Pleasures of Imagination (accessed at Mnstate 14.2.17) – http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/addison414.htm

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Leave a comment

A1: Context and References

Stourhead - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Notes on Context

I came to this project on the back of my research into the history of landscape art, an investigation that touched on painting, photography and landscape gardening, mediums that turned out to be surprisingly interrelated. The essays that record this research are posted, here:

Landscape Before Photography

The Conventions of 18th and 19th Century Landscape Art

The Historical Sublime

The Sublime in Contemporary Art

Landscape Gardening: “Britain’s Greatest Contribution to the Visual Arts”

The series references a number of photographers.

Aravaipa Creek Preserve, Arizona - Lee Friedlander 1999

Aravaipa Creek Preserve, Arizona – Lee Friedlander 1999

Lee Friedlander

The original idea to take on the challenge of photographing the landscape through the branches of trees came from, to me, the quite surprising source of Lee Friedlander. His recently published book, Western Landscapes (1) contains a number of photographs where the foreground is dominated by unruly tangles of bare branches. They are enigmatic but strangely alluring, a sense of peeping out through the undergrowth, often at the majestic Western landscape. It was Friedlander’s friend and contemporary Garry Winogrand who said “I have a burning desire to see what things look like photographed by me” and I wonder whether this also part of Friedlander’s motive.

From the series The Painter's Pool - Jem Southam 2003

From the series The Painter’s Pool – Jem Southam 2003

Jem Southam

Once the idea was implanted I looked carefully at Jem Southam. Unfortunately I do not own a copy of The Painter’s Pool but have reviewed many of the pictures on line and particularly enjoyed his interview with Andrew Nadolski where he explained why he had embarked on that project.

“How does someone who draws or paints deal with the extraordinary visual complexities presented when standing in the canopy of a wood?” (6)

I was taken by the idea that one of Britain’s best known landscape photographers would set himself such a direct challenge and whilst I had no expectations of achieving the same results I felt that to photograph similar environments would help me develop my practice.

I do have copies of The Red River (3) and River Winter (4) (my review is written up here) and, as might be expected, Southam’s approach to winter, river, untamed nature and the intervention of man were all influential. Also, and very importantly, Southam’s work is imbued with a deep sense of the history of the land, a subject that directs a lot of my work and that played a significant part in my project for assignment 1.

From the series Woodwork - Damian Ward

From the series Woodwork – Damian Ward

Damian Ward 

Damian Ward is an English landscape photographer working mostly in the Chilterns. Like Southam he appears to have invested a significant amount of time in a single landscape, an approach which allows the photographer to seek out the essence of that land.

Woodwork (5) is a series taken in or on the fringes of forest and I found Ward’s use of colour to differentiate the detail of these seemingly chaotic spaces particularly interesting.

From the series Ridge Trees - David Baker

From the series Ridge Trees – David Baker

David Baker

David Baker is a Southampton based photography who has often worked in the New Forest. Ridge Trees (6) is another series published by Kozu Books that exclusively focuses on trees. Baker’s work is an interesting mixture of work that speaks to the “fine art” photography market and sensitive studies of the atmosphere of deep woodland. When working inside the forest the photograph can never include the “whole” it is always a component, a detail, that is selected and I found his compositions of parts of trees particularly helpful in moving me away from attempting to frame too large a scene.

Sources

Books

(1) Friedlander, Lee (2016) Western Landscapes. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery.

(3) Southam, Jem (1989) The Red River. Manchester: Cornerhouse Publications

(4) Southam, Jem (2012) The River Winter. London: MACK

(5) Ward, Damian (ND) Woodwork. Bath: Kozu Books

(6) Baker, David (ND) Ridge Trees.  Bath: Kozu Books

Internet

(2) Nadolski, Andrew (2013) Stories from the Land: Jem Southam in Conversation with Andrew Nadolski (accessed at On Landscape 21.2.17) – https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2013/03/jem-southam-interview/

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A1: Beauty and the Sublime – Request for Peer Review

Following feedback both here and on the OCA Discussion Forum I have made several changes to my provisional series for assignment 1. Whilst a number of critiques were positive about the geometry of the winter branches the series was rather one dimensional. The most significant change is therefore the inclusion of some different perspectives of the same land.

Stourhead 01 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 01 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 02 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 02 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 03 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 03 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 04 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 04 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 05 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 05 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 06 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 06 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 07 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 07 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 08 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 08 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Landscape assignment 1 asks us to convey our interpretation of beauty and/or the sublime and I selected Stourhead as the site for this series as it is recognised as one of Britains greatest landscape gardens and in that sense a landscape specifically designed to be picturesque. I was interested in how effectively its eighteenth century designer and its latter-day guardians had been successful in keeping nature inside the bounds of their preconceived notion of the beautiful. I wanted to look the “other way” where nature was pushing back into the man-made landscape and reinstating its natural and chaotic state. It is a study of the edgelands that surround and at times have invaded a groomed, stylised, idyllic landscape.

The final submitted series will be accompanied by a 500 word supporting text but at this stage I would appreciate any feedback you might have.

_7508225

Stourhead 1 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

_nk39076

Stourhead 2 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

_7508227

Stourhead 3 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

_7508291

Stourhead 4 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

_7508296

Stourhead 5 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

_nk39154

Stourhead 6 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 7 - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Stourhead 7 – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime | 6 Comments

A1 Research: Jem Southam – Two Rivers

Stourhead - Steve Middlehurst 2017

Picturesque Stourhead – Steve Middlehurst 2017

Landscape photography is a broad church and when compared with the other main genres of photography it is perhaps the one that comes with the most historical baggage. I have discussed at some length its roots in landscape painting (here)  but beyond that historic context the conventions of painting  in terms of subject matter: the picturesque, pastural,  grandeur and sublimity to name but a few, and in terms of composition continue to dominate contemporary, popular landscape photography.

Following an approach promoted by most of the photographic press, how-to books, photography clubs and websites many photographers have perfected the representation of a perfectly lit, picturesque view of pastural, coastal or wild Britain. I admire the results, recognise their technical expertise, respect their dedication and admit, particularly in my medium format days, to searching out the reflection of mountains in dark lakes, autumn colours on misty mornings and idyllic rural scenes. In terms of aesthetics there is little wrong with the best of such work, the picturesque is popular because most of us take pleasure from beautiful scenery but it is often more pop than jazz, alluring, technically perfect and formally composed; however, only the most exceptional piece passes the test of time, whereas jazz offers multiple levels of complexity that draws us back time and again to explore it more deeply.

There are two main problems with popular, picturesque landscape photography; firstly the pictures are often presented as single images or collections linked only by broad geographical categories as opposed to series that develop conceptual themes. This reduces the images to scenic snapshots that concentrate attention on the visible, superficial characteristics of the land; the eye-catching reflections disguise the dark waters of the lake, the striking autumn colours camouflage the forest.

The second problem is that the search for an ideal viewpoint and perfect light tends to idealise the land, promoting a rural idyll that advertises rather than investigates the countryside. The nature of the advertisement may, as previously discussed (here), have some similarity to the early photographers of the American West by presenting the landscape as real estate, a place to invest, exploit or settle. Alternatively, and harking back to the picturesque painters of the eighteenth century or Ansel Adams in the American National Parks, it can promote the land as a tourist amenity, a place to visit, a view to find or even, in the age of social media, to capture as a trophy photograph.

In either case the end result is to compress a million years of geological transition and twelve millennium of human intervention into, what Liz Wells calls, the “welcoming picturesque” (1: p.164)

Jem Southam – The Red River

The Red River, Reskadinnick - Jem Southam 1982-1989

The Red River, Reskadinnick – Jem Southam 1982-1989

Jem Southam’s landscape series are jazz; complex, challenging and initially a little bewildering; photographs that demand we return to investigate multiple layers of complexity and to decode his intentions. Few of his photographs are scenic in any picturesque sense; he frequently studies discrete spaces isolated from the wider countryside with tight compositions, misty backgrounds or flat horizons under white skies. He rarely attempts to portray a place in its entirety; his perspective of the land is contained in series of economically framed viewpoints that represent the landscape as a mosaic of details through which its history, present and future is revealed. This sensitivity to history is best seen in the Red River (2) Series in which he explores a Cornish valley formed by a geographically insignificant brook finding the shortest route from the Bolenowe Moors to the sea at St Ives Bay. In their essay that contextualises the photographs Frank Turk and Jan Ruhrmund describe the history of the valley and its river from the ice age to human habitation and agriculture, to the development of small-scale tin and lead processing, its nineteenth century decline and finally the post industrial age. (i) (3)

This background history is fundamental to understanding Southam’s photographs which chart the complete cycle of the valley’s geological origins, the rise and demise of the primordial forest, its long period as a pastoral idyll, the ravaging of the land by mining and industrial processes through to industrial decline and the area’s subsequent reinvention as a recreational amenity. The sweeping scale of this series is breathtaking, few photographers have attempted to record such a monumental passage of time and all in less than fifty photographs.

Bolenowe - Jem Southam 1982-1989

Bolenowe – Jem Southam 1982-1989

The passage of time is matched by the diversity of the pictures. He uses natural rock formations and old farm buildings to describe the black rock at the source of the valley; wooded valleys, and detailed studies of lichen loaded branches to represent the primordial – a hint of what is to come in his much later The River Winter series. For pastoral idyll he offers a careful judged mixture of broad landscape and telling details, contrasting the lush pastures of Bolenowe with the grey stone farms that speak of hard places, marooned amid brooding hills and muddy yards that starkly contrast the image of Cornwalls’ rivera with its quaint fishing villages and boutique hotels.

Mine Engine House, the Great Flat Lode, Newton Moor. - Jem Southam 1982-1989

Mine Engine House, the Great Flat Lode, Newton Moor. – Jem Southam 1982-1989

The sequencing of the series takes us from the sublime high moors, into the dark forest, cleared to create the wide open spaces of farming that were then invaded by the santanic mills of industry and below the surface into Tolkien-like tunnels carved through the rich red rock in search of minerals. Following the trajectory of the locations our emotions move ever downwards before he lifts the mood with new farms, bright gardens and tourist beaches. Few photographers master the art of narrative, the medium mitigates against easy story telling; Red River is a sophisticated, complex but ultimately successful narrative because it demands our close attention; asking us to recognise the rhythms created by his changes in perspective, from close shot to broad vistas and his use of colour to juxtapose old with new, nature with industrial debris and life with death.

Southam describes his approach:

“I ensue grandeur for the sake of it, preferring to revel in a subtler scale and history. But there is still an epic story to be told, which exists wherever humans have made their homes.” (4)

There is a honest reality about the Red River, it is not the Cornwall of postcards, Doc Martin and yellow, cream-rich, ice cream. It is initially melancholy, history weighs heavily on the first two thirds of the series; a deforested landscape, failed industry, struggling farms, dilapidated buildings and a land scarred by man’s exploitation but towards the end it contains a strong narrative of rebirth and reinvention. In a series that excludes any human subjects we find the story of man’s interaction with the land and a community that has consistently found new ways to survive in this valley.

??

??

The River Winter

The River Winter (5), created some twenty years after The Red River, develops many of the same themes but by comparing the two series we can map the development, or perhaps it is better described as the refinement, of Southam’s voice. Andrew Nadolski highlights the way this series draws “on an almost medieval notion of the dark, deep winter.” (6) By studying a small river and a local landscape that both defines and responds to the river’s moods and movements, Southam asks how we see the countryside, what is a river and what is winter. The long term decrease in agricultural and land-based work, the shift to first industrial and then commercial employment and the resultant ruralisation of the population has isolated twenty-first century man from the natural world. Seasonal shifts in weather patterns are considered in terms of their impact on our movement in air conditioned transport between centrally heated homes and climate controlled commercial premises; once inside these artificial spaces we are cocooned from the direct impact of the weather. Few of us will visit the dark, damp, cold, grey and denuded winter landscape of a rural valley, preferring the warmth of towns and cities, the drama of snowy mountains or wild coastal vistas; if we visit the countryside at all in winter we continue to seek out the sublime or the picturesque and ignore the detail of a dormant land.

Leat, River Culm at Rewe, 6 December 2010 - Jem Southam 2010

Leat, River Culm at Rewe, 6 December 2010 – Jem Southam 2010

To our distant ancestors the impact of winter was directly life threatening; the shortening of days, falling temperatures, rising rivers, flooded lowlands and the need to slaughter livestock for lack of grazing and the labour of storing food for the dark months were the precursor to their most challenging period of the year. It is no coincidence that mid-winter has been the most important festival in northern climes since pre-history; sun rise at the winter solstice symbolises the return of life to the land. As Southam points out:

“Winter is embedded in the imagination and culture of those of us who have lived our lives across North Western Europe.” (6)

As well as evoking the cultural memory of winter he also mines the myth of the forest, a subject he previously explored in The Painter’s Pool. These two themes combine in an evocative way so that the dark waters of the Exe and its tributaries running beneath winter trees taps into our fear of cold icy water and dark living forests, places of mythical creatures and dark deeds.

The Red River was organised as a chronology of many millennium, a sweeping historical view; The River Winter remains chronologically organised, it follows a single winter, but despite this comparatively brief timescale Southam continues to draw the history of this and any similar place into the pictures. There is a sense of timelessness, of the season’s cyclical changes being painted onto a canvas of an ancient river in an enduring landscape; it is the winter of 2010/11 and every previous winter seen on this river.

The other overriding sense we gain from the series is that of a diary; a walk through the season, a re-animation of Southam’s progress along the banks of the Exe and its tributaries that winter. Hotshot Magazine describes his work as belonging “to a British tradition of close-looking and thoughtful study and reflection” (7) and this translates into the series being a very personal viewpoint bringing Southam into the pictures and underlining the sense of following in the photographer’s footsteps.

The Painter’s Pool, 9 November 2003 - Jem Southam 2003

The Painter’s Pool, 9 November 2003 – Jem Southam 2003

If we view River Winter in the context of Southam’s wider body of work we can identify other themes; in Painter’s Pool he investigated the challenge of a colleague who was painting woodland scenes from vantage points under and surrounded by the canopy, he described this idea in an interview with Andrew Nadolski:

“How does someone who draws or paints deal with the extraordinary visual complexities presented when standing in the canopy of a wood?” (6)

The published series is not unique, Lee Friedlander recently published interpretation of the American West includes similar but monochrome studies (8), but the sheer complexity of many of the pictures refused the idea that the photographer’s role is to simplify complexity. In Painter’s Pool he represents the cycle of birth and decay; the balance between man’s intervention and neglect and of the visual diversity of tiny areas of wilderness that have survived or fought back against the deforestation of the land.

River Exe at Bickleigh, 22 November 2010 - Jem Southam 2010

River Exe at Bickleigh, 22 November 2010 – Jem Southam 2010

In River Winter he returns to these same visual complexities but now the river is ever present in the background, slowly but remorselessly wending its way seaward behind the tangle of branches, twigs and dying or dead leaves. The resultant work is more topographical than Painter’s Pool, the river and the broader landscape offers more context to the forest but he continues to bring to our attention that it is in winter that the countryside is stripped bare and behind living nature and along side the ever moving river there is always stillness, death and decay.

Everything about Southam’s work is contemplative, there is a stillness in his compositions that reflects the slow process of 10 x 8 photography and the premeditation of the photographer. In Italy there is a slow food movement that grew in response to the spread of American-style fast food outlets; towns and cities attempt to block what they see as a cultural invasion by burger bars and thick crust pizza stalls; Jem Southam promotes a slow photography movement, an alternative to the rapid, thoughtless and excessive capture of thoughtless images that digital photography has facilitated. He takes forty to fifty pictures a year (6) so the forty photographs in River Winter represent a full year’s output not an edited down selection of thousands of negatives; I find this idea humbling.

River Culm at Silverton Mill, 22 January 2011 - Jem Southam 2011

River Culm at Silverton Mill, 22 January 2011 – Jem Southam 2011

As previously argued Southam’s work has multiple layers of complexity beneath the obvious visual surface of the prints; he is deeply interested in the land in the context of its history and our relationship to it. We recognise that all the land on our small islands has been modified by man to provide habitats, food, the site of industrial processes, the raw materials of technology or as transport routes and we like to think of this in terms of planned and structured processes; deforestation for agriculture and ship building, the industrial and agricultural revolutions, the growth and decline of the railways, the creation of the M4 high-tech corridor or the trading hub that is the City of London but these events are only logical and structured when viewed in hindsight. Southam seeks out the unstructured, chaotic corners of the land that hold the evidence of man’s casual intervention or “the result of the technologies required to do the particular actions required” (6)

We are very ready to describe photographers as inspirational without always being specific about what they inspired us to do. Southam taught me to look the other way, to ignore the obvious in the landscape that adds nothing to our overall knowledge of the land and to seek out the forgotten and ignored: the unintentional wildernesses we have created at major road junctions or on the verges of motorways and railways, the fringes of ancient forest that survive close to urbanisation or the land unintentionally preserved in an ancient state by the Ministry of Defence’s requisition of great swathes of Dorset, Wilshire and Norfolk for military training.

I will end with another quotation from Southam that goes some way to explaining his intent:

“My overall artistic intentions are to make work that explores how our history, our memory, and our systems of knowledge combine to influence our responses to the places we inhabit, visit, create, and dream of.” (4)

River Creedy at Sweetham, 4 December 2010 - Jem Southam 2010

River Creedy at Sweetham, 4 December 2010 – Jem Southam 2010

Notes on Text

(i) For thousands of years after the end of the ice age man left few traces of their presence in this valley, a neolithic axe head found by a hedger, two Bronze Age barrows and a Roman style villa, and evidence of medieval wool processing show this land was hunted then farmed for five thousand years but it remained a rural backwater until the fifteenth century when an entrepreneurial family established a business mining tin and extracting lead around the Red River. In the centuries that followed these small-scale industrial processes reshaped the landscape until the “great trade recession” hit the county in the mid-nineteenth century, a national event that led to mass emigration and the industrial decline of the valley. (3)

Sources

Books

(1) Wells, Liz (2011) Land Matters: landscape Photography, Culture and Identity (Kindle Edition). London: I.B.Taurus

(2) Southam, Jem (1989) The Red River. Manchester: Cornerhouse Publications

(3) Turk, Frank and Ruhrmund Jan (1989) Red River Valley (an essay in The Red River). Manchester: Cornerhouse Publications

(5) Southam, Jem (2012) The River Winter. London: MACK

(8) Friedlander, Lee (2016) Western Landscapes. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery.

Internet

(4) Schuman, Aaron (2005) Landscape Stories: An Interview with Jem Southam (accessed at Seesaw 21.2.17) – http://seesawmagazine.com/southam_pages/southam_interview.html

(6) Nadolski, Andrew (2013) Stories from the Land: Jem Southam in Conversation with Andrew Nadolski (accessed at On Landscape 21.2.17) – https://www.onlandscape.co.uk/2013/03/jem-southam-interview/

(7) Hotshoe (2013) Jem Southam: The River Winter Reviewed (accessed at Hotshot 21.2.17) – http://www.hotshoeinternational.com/issues/182/books/jem-southam-the-river-winter-reviewed

Gibbons, Nikki (2013) Interview with Jem Southam (accessed at Nikki Gibbons Photography 21.2.17) – http://nikkigibbonsphotography.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/interview-with-jem-southam.html

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Books & Exhibitions, Research and Reflection | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A1 Research: Stourhead

Watercolour of Stourhead by by Coplestone Warre Bampflyde 1775

Watercolour of Stourhead by by Coplestone Warre Bampflyde 1775

View of Stourhead Garden, Wiltshire - Copplestone Warre Bamfylde 1770s

View of Stourhead Garden, Wiltshire – Copplestone Warre Bamfylde 1770s

Stourhead: View over the Lake - Joseph Mallord William Turner 1798

Stourhead: View over the Lake – Joseph Mallord William Turner 1798

Stourhead: The Gothic Cross above the Lake - Joseph Mallord William Turner 1798

Stourhead: The Gothic Cross above the Lake – Joseph Mallord William Turner 1798

The Gardens at Stourhead - John Constable 1811

The Gardens at Stourhead – John Constable 1811

Posted in Research and Reflection | Leave a comment

A1 Research: Landscape Gardening – “Britain’s Greatest Contribution to the Visual Arts”

The Rotunda and the Queen's Theatre, Stowe - Jean Baptiste Claude Chatelain 1753

The Rotunda and the Queen’s Theatre, Stowe – Jean Baptiste Claude Chatelain 1753

Nikolaus Pevsner (i) referred to the English Landscape garden as “Britains’ greatest contribution to the visual arts” (1: loc.270), Tim Robinson expands, saying:

“The English Landscape is the greatest artform ever to have been devised in the British Isles. What is more, it is an artform that has gone on to influence the rest of the world like no other in our history.” (1: loc. 254)

The English Landscape garden was one of many artistic and cultural responses to the fashionable Grand Tour (ii) that had started in the late sixteenth century and was still fashionable as late as the early part of the twentieth century. The British have long exhibited an inferiority complex in regards to culture, often appearing to believe that it is an imported commodity with its roots firmly planted in classical art and history, that the Romans created the foundations of all that is good in Britain and that their departure heralded a dark age of ignorance and violence (iii) only fully relieved by the Enlightenment in the sixteenth century. For three hundred years the Grand Tourists imported the latest trends in every aspect of the arts from painting to gardening.

It is often suggested that the early English landscape garden was strongly influenced by the paintings of the likes of Claude Lorraine and Nicolas Poussin but both Kenneth Woodbridge (6) and Richardson  argue that this is an over simplification. Richardson believes that classical poetry, contemporary literature and the gardens of Italy were more significant influences (1: loc.197) and that the conception of these gardens was intrinsically linked to the Whig movement and the restructuring of rural British life (1: loc.119) which included the Enclosures, new agrarian technologies and crops. Woodbridge argues that, whilst architecture was intrinsic to the great French gardens, in Britain it was built to idealise the scene and reflected the influence of Leone Battista Alberti who had promoted the idea of the perfect country estate as including grottos, monuments, caves and springs (6: p.8)

Jacob with Laban and his Daughters - Claude Lorrain 1654

Jacob with Laban and his Daughters – Claude Lorrain 1654

In 1712 Joseph Addison wrote an essay for The Spectator magazine, a call to arms that is often viewed as a manifesto for English garden design although it must have bemused many landowners at the time and was perhaps less revolutionary than it first appears (iv). Addison criticises the contemporary European style of gardening which exhibited, what Robinson calls “a strict demarkation between garden and surrounding agriculture” (1: p.1708) and as then pursued by British gardeners “Our trees rise in cones, lobes, and pyramids. We see the marks of the scissors upon every plant and bush …… I would rather look upon a tree in all its luxuriancy and diffusion of boughs and branches, than when it is thus cut and trimmed into a mathematical figure” (3) Addison argues for a different and more natural approach:

“But why may not a whole estate be thrown into a kind of garden by frequent plantations, that may turn as much to the profit as the pleasure of the owner? A marsh overgrown with willows, or a mountain shaded with oaks, are not only more beautiful, but more beneficial, than when they lie bare and unadorned. fields of corn make a pleasant prospect, and if the walks were a little taken care of that lie between them, if the natural embroidery of the meadows were helped and improved by some small additions of art, and the several rows of hedges set off by trees and flowers that the soil was capable of receiving, a man might make a pretty landskip of his own possessions.” (3)

This is the first known use of the word landskip to describe land as opposed to a painting of land (v) so in this essay Addison not only documents what would become the agenda for gardening in the next fifty years of English gardening but presaged the term landscape garden and the distinction between the terms land and landscape.

Badminton Gloucestershire ca. 1682

Badminton Gloucestershire ca. 1682

In the mid to late seventeenth century the vogue was for Baroque gardens with complex, symmetrical patterns organised in distinct parterres or sections surrounding the house. Badminton in Gloucestershire was a remarkable example of this style where the mansion was dwarfed by its geometric architectural gardens.

Chatsworth, View of Mansion and Gardens ca. 1685

Chatsworth, View of Mansion and Gardens ca. 1685

The extent of the symmetrical garden was even greater at Chatsworth in Derbyshire which had been laid out when the house was rebuilt in 1685. Woodbridge points out that the English landscape style that was to follow created landscapes that were “self-contained worlds” (6: p.11) often detached or remote from the house which had previously laid at the centre of garden design as seen in these examples.

The new English Landscape movement must have been attractive to landowners not just for its aesthetic appeal but for pragmatic financial reasons; the Baroque garden required professional surveyors and designers, vast numbers of plants and significant construction of paths, walls and outbuildings. A more natural, and cost effective look, must have appealed to many landowners. It should also be recognised that timber was the raw material of industry and the technologies of the age so garden designs that included the planting of managed woodland were not just aesthetic additions but prudent investments that spoke to the patriotism of a landowner in a country so dependant on its navy and trading fleets.

The Father of Psyche Sacrificing at the Temple of Apollo - Claude Lorrain 1662 - 63

The Father of Psyche Sacrificing at the Temple of Apollo – Claude Lorrain 1662 – 63

The English Landscape gardens of the early eighteenth century were typically laid out by land owning enthusiasts rather than by professionals. A landowner with an artistic bent could create a garden by eye rather than by set square and measuring tape, so its classification as an art form holds true with the gardener (vi) approaching his land in the way of a painter not an engineer. The resulting gardens are more idiosyncratic that the conventional and idealised designs of men like Capability Brown and Humphry Repton who were working later in the middle of the century.

Another significant difference between the early and later gardens is that these pioneering gardeners saw their designs as an expression of more complex ideas, in essence they were conceptual art. On first glance the temples, grottos, obelisks, statuary and topographical features appear merely to mimic the classical structures and Italian gardens seen on the Grand Tour or to ape the buildings in Claude’s idealised landscape paintings, and there is a strong element of these influences. However, the men who laid out these early gardens appropriated the style of those structures and invested them with new meanings so the features at Leasowes become a tribute to friendship and others like Castle Howard a statement of their family status, whilst at Stourhead the memorials, grottos and buildings are dedicated to pagan deities and heroes such as Aeneas, Hercules and King Alfred (6: p.10) . By linking the development of the English garden with the prevailing socio-political climate Robinson extends the expressionism in these gardens to much wider meanings:

“The garden was a realm in which aesthetic theories, philosophical ideals, poetic trends and even political ideologies could be illustrated to dramatic and innovative effect.” (1: loc.254)

Moor Park Farnham ca. 1690s

Moor Park Farnham ca. 1690s

By the beginning of the eighteenth century garden design in Britain had already significantly moved away from the rigid symmetry of the Baroque style. In the 1650s Sir William Temple had laid out the garden at Moor Park in Farnham based on his ideas of a “wholly irregular” garden (1: loc.535). The surviving plan, as shown above, illustrates the formal, symmetrical gardens adjoining the house but also includes a ‘serpentine” area (coloured green on the engraving) that led Pevsner to argue that Temple had:

“Started a line of thought and visual conceptions which was to dominate first England and then the World for two centuries. It is the first suggestion ever of a possible beauty fundamentally different from the formal, a beauty of irregularity and fancy.” (4)

Robinson refers to this concept as the introduction of “wiggles” which had first been pioneered by William Bentinck, the 1st Earl of Portland, in his garden at Bulstrode Park. Temple and Bentinck became friends and companions to William of Orange who acceded to the British throne in 1688. This relationships brought together a natural garden movement that was already underway in Holland, the design of William’s estate in Holland with its emphasis on hunting grounds and the irregularity and wiggles pioneered by Temple and Bentinck. Royalty has always set fashions but in the wake of the ‘Glorious Revolution’ it was politically expedient to make tangible expressions of support of the new order. As bizarre as this sounds today adopting William and his friends’ ideas on gardening made good political sense. These changes did not immediately result in a wholesale replanting of the formal country house garden but were represented by a more gradual change in emphasis with the “ratio of decorative parterre to forest and planted enclosures …. tilted much more in the favour of the latter” (1: loc.816)

Temple of the Four Winds, Castle Howard - Carl Loubin 1997

Temple of the Four Winds, Castle Howard – Carl Loubin 1997

In 1700 Charles Howard, the 3rd Earl of Carlisle commissioned the re-deisgn of Wray Wood, a forty acre plantation at Castle Howard. The designer, George London, proposed a geometrically laid out star of rides in the continental Baroque style but Howard rejected the proposal. Howard was the product of his time and the Grand Tour and “steeped in classical poetry” (5); he wanted to created an idealised landscape with gravel walks, statuary and water features. The eventual designer is unknown but by 1705 the new garden area had matured, the Temple of the Four Winds was added in 1728 followed by a Roman Bridge and Mausoleum in 1744. Stephen Switzer, a contemporary designer was fulsome in his praise:

“From the wood which lyes much higher are many pretty views. In it is an artificial romantick cave or grotto and cascades of water that run down from it and by a pretty summer house at the bottom into a fountain.” (1: loc.1119)

Castle Howard marks the identifiable beginning of the style that would become known as the English Landscape garden. The style had developed gradually from the Baroque with various transitional gardens like Moor Park but Castle Howard is of such scale and ambition that it feels like the first fully thought through naturalistic design that makes no attempt to adopt any previous English or continental formal style.

The Deer in Petworth Park - J.M.W. Turner 1827

The Deer in Petworth Park – J.M.W. Turner 1827

The English Landscape garden in, what is now referred to as, the Arcadian style was to become a significant artistic and culture achievement of the eighteenth century. Designers like William Kent laid out Chiswick, Stowe, Rousham and Kew and Henry Hoare created Stourhead. In the 1750’s Lancelot ‘Capability’ Brown, who had worked with Kent in the 1740s, began a second phase where the Arcadian garden was simplified and reflected social changes so his gardens were more often designed to be viewed by carriage rather than the walks of Stowe or Stourhead.

Brown’s designs were more utilitarian than the idiosyncratic early gardens with their rich vein of meanings, he dispensed with the Romano-Greco buildings and focussed more on carefully designed natural plantings. The Brown landscapes played to the pragmatic nature of the English landowner whose estates needed to show a profit with trees as an aesthetic but also economic resource and the creation of ‘cover’ for shooting game birds. Brown’s most notable gardens include Petworth which J.M.W. Turner painted on several occasions, Blenheim and Sheringham Park. (7)

Kent, then Brown represent a golden age of English garden design and it is their vision and the ideas of landowners like the Hoare family that elevated the English Landscape to an artform. Their influence on gardens around the world was and continues to be significant; George Washington and Thomas Jefferson based their Virginian estates designs on the Arcadian style. (8) and the contemporary Italian garden designer Antonio Peruzzi points out that:

“The romantic British garden still has its influence: there are several young Chinese landscape architects who are now making real money designing so-called modern gardens that look like a pale imitation of ……  English garden design.” (9)

So, the artform lives on across the world and the English Landscape Garden, not least because it forms the backdrop to popular British costume drama, remains a fundamental characteristic of our nation character and the international perspective of rural England.

Notes on Text

(i) Nikolaus Prevsner was the editor in chief of Buildings of Britain and, according to Tim Richardson, “a man of impeccable modernist credentials” (9: loc. 270)

(ii) From the late sixteenth century young aristocrats from Britain, Germany and Scandinavia visited the great European capitals of London, Paris, Venice, Florence and Rome as the culmination of their classical studies. These young men had enjoyed a classical education studying Greek and Latin literature and it was considered an essential attribute of men of this class to have an appropriate interest in the arts. The Grand Tour, as it came to be known had a significant commercial influence on the arts with painters such as Claude Lorrain, Canalleto and many others basing their practices on the creation of ‘souvenirs’ for  wealthy tourists. Claude Lorrain was so popular with British tourists that at “one point fully two thirds of his paintings were in Britain and the British museum still holds 40% of his drawings” (2). Tim Robinson argues that at the beginning of the eighteenth century there were only a “few dozen” Britons who could be termed connoisseurs of painted art and that the Grand Tourists made their purchasing decisions based on the advice of art dealers rather then their own taste. (1: loc.6446) 

(iii) The view that the Roman occupation of Britan was a cultural, political, artistic and social highlight in an otherwise dark period of prehistory and history until the Enlightenment is one that has been long taught in British schools. Archeological finds and research in the last two decades have shown that this is a misconception. There is now significant evidence that Southern Britain was a sophisticated and civilised society long before the Roman invasion and that during the so-called dark ages after they left it was British monasteries that led the way in keeping learning alive whilst Europe was in turmoil. 

(iv) Apart from the fact that long before Addison’s essay there had been a gradual movement away from stylised continental designs, Robinson argues that it suited Addison and other Whigs to claim that their ideas on gardening had instigated a revolution of taste and that the new designs were the brainchild of brilliant Whig gentlemen with the de-formailsed garden expressing the victory of Protestant freedom over Catholic tyranny. Robinson calls this the “Whig interpretation of garden history” but the reality is that the new gardens included Tories and Whigs, aristocrats and new money and more surprisingly not all the new landscapes were being created on the great estates; clergymen and local squires also played their part. (1: loc.1722)

(v) Landskip was term derived from the Dutch  landschap or land shape in English. Robinson states that it was used “exclusively to describe landscape paintings” (1: p.2084).

(vi) Whenever I read of ‘gardeners’ in this context I always wonder just how often they dug a trench, pruned their roses, mulched a bed, built a compost heap or any other gardening task that requires and aching back, sweat and quite often a little blood. The reality is that most, if not all, of these men were directors of gardeners, not gardeners in any sense of word we would understand today.

Sources

Books

(1) Richardson, Tim (2008) Arcadian Friends (kindle edition) London: Transworld

(6) Woodbridge, Kenneth ( 1986) The Stourhead Landscape. London: The National Trust

Internet

(2) Prodger, Michael (2011) Claude Lorrain: The Enchanted Landscape (accessed at The Spectator 14.2.17) – http://www.spectator.co.uk/2011/10/claude-lorrain-the-enchanted-landscape/

(3) Addison, Joseph (1712) The Pleasures of Imagination (accessed at Mnstate 14.2.17) – http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/addison414.htm

(4) Pevsner, Nikolaus (1956) Cited by Garden Visit in Moor Park Surrey (accessed at Garden Visit 14.2.17) – http://www.gardenvisit.com/gardens/moor_park_surrey

(5) Garden Visit – Castle Howard Garden (accessed at Garden Visit 14.2.17) – http://www.gardenvisit.com/gardens/castle_howard_garden

(7) Attar, Rob (2010) The English Landscape Garden (accessed at History Extra 14.2.17) – http://www.historyextra.com/feature/english-landscape-garden

(8) American Gardening (2017) Politics Influenced Modern English Garden (accessed at American Gardening 14.2.17) – http://americangardening.net/category/garden-style/

(9) Robinson, Tim (2014) What European Garden Designers Really Think of Britain (accessed at The Telegraph 14.2.17) – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/gardening/10560487/What-European-garden-designers-really-think-of-Britain.html

Posted in Assignment 1 - Beauty and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Leave a comment

A Personal View of the Sublime

Towards the Maiella - Steve Middlehurst 2007

Towards the Maiella – Steve Middlehurst 2007

After spending so long looking at the historic and contemporary view of the Sublime I spent a little time looking back through my own work to identify a few photographs that might represent some traditional Burkian Sublime attributes. They are from a time when I walked and photographed regularly in the Gran Sasso range in Abruzzo Italy and my interpretation of the Sublime may be strongly influenced by an irrational fear of heights.

Looking Down from The North Face of Mount Camicia - Steve MIddlehurst

The North Face of Mount Camicia – Steve MIddlehurst 2008

Alba Fucens - Steve Middlehurst 2009

Alba Fucens – Steve Middlehurst 2009

Corno Grande from Mount Tremmogia - Steve Middlehurst

Corno Grande from Mount Tremmogia – Steve Middlehurst 2007

The Fino Valley in Winter - Steve Middlehurst

The Fino Valley in Winter – Steve Middlehurst 2009

Santa Maria a Pagliara - Steve Middlehurst 2008

Santa Maria a Pagliara – Steve Middlehurst 2008

Corno Grande and Gran Sasso - Steve Middlehurst

Corno Grande and Gran Sasso – Steve Middlehurst

Posted in 3 - The Beautiful and the Sublime, Research and Reflection | Leave a comment